Hold your MP accountable.

The MP voted against a motion in February 2026 but voted in favour of a similar motion in June 2025, representing a clear reversal on how the NDP caucus decided to apply its vote on government measures.

The MP shifted from criticizing the carbon price as insufficient and ineffective ("up for debate," "smoke and mirrors," "will not even allow us to meet targets") in 2017 to defending it as "one of the rare tools that works" and essential ("without it there is nothing left") in 2022.

The MP shifted from opposing carbon pricing as ineffective "smoke and mirrors" in 2017 to defending it in 2022 as "one of the rare tools that works," representing a clear reversal on the policy's merit.

The MP opposed government-paid dental care in 2022 but championed and took credit for implementing an NDP dental care program by 2024.

The MP shifted from questioning whether the notwithstanding clause should exist at all (implying skepticism about its legitimacy in 2023) to accepting it as "constitutional, legal and legitimate" while focusing criticism on its *frequency and manner of use* rather than its existence (in 2025).

The MP's rhetorical approach and priorities shifted significantly: in 2018 they engaged in philosophical wordplay about conservative motions and physics theory, while in 2023 they centered their argument on concrete existential crises around basic needs like food, housing, and safety—suggesting a move from abstract parliamentary critique to urgent advocacy for material welfare issues.